Nov 24, 2018
Did you know that there is a distinct and valuable advantage to
having more scientists running for office? When scientists step out
and contribute to the political process, we get more people making
policy decisions that value facts and evidence. During the midterm
elections, ten new science-credentialed candidates were elected:
one senator and nine members of the House.
The current members of the 115th Congress include one physicist,
one microbiologist, and one chemist, as well as eight engineers and
one mathematician. The medical professions are slightly better
represented, with three nurses and 15 doctors, as well as at least
three veterinarians.
Here to discuss the unique advantage of getting scientists elected
to public office is Shaughnessy Naughton. Shaughnessy is an
entrepreneur with a degree in chemistry and a passion for
understanding the role of science in our everyday lives. With a
background in research and drug discovery, Shaughnessy decided to
get involved in politics because she is concerned about the future
of science in the United States.
Recently the NRA told medical professionals that they need to,
“Stay in their lane” and stop talking about gun control. Should
professionals like scientists, engineers, and health care workers
sit on the sidelines while policies are created? According to
Shaughnessy Naughton, the answer is a resounding, “No!” Shaughnessy
is passionate about energizing and mobilizing as many science
professionals as possible into the work of politics and public
policy, at all levels of government.
Shaughnessy is so passionate about getting these professionals into
politics because she recognizes the value of having legislators who
champion a robust trust in facts and evidence. One of the main
reasons we have failed as a nation to tackle issues such as gun
control, health care, and climate change can be traced back to the
fact that we fail to heed the findings from scientists and
researchers. Learn more about Shaughnessy’s efforts to get more
scientists running for office by checking out the resource section
at the end of this post.
Let’s face it, right now our politics are personality driven. What if there were a way to get away from the personality and ego of political disagreements and get down to the facts? Shaughnessy Naughton wants to see more scientists running for office to deflate the giant ego trip and get us back to facts and evidence-based policy decisions. While each person brings a different perspective to the table, scientists tend to take a more collaborative approach to making decisions.
Recognizing a severe deficit of scientists involved in politics,
Shaughnessy launched her campaign back in 2014. After running a
business for over a decade, she stepped up to run for Congress in
Pennsylvania’s 8th District. With no prior political experience,
other than phoning legislators and knocking on doors for campaigns,
she faced an uphill battle. Ultimately, Shaughnessy was not
successful, but she did receive a tremendous amount of support from
the scientific community. In light of her experience running for
office, Shaughnessy founded 314 Action to encourage and unite the
scientific community to do more than advocate for science, and to
get involved in the political process.
To hear more about Shaughnessy’s valuable work with 314 Action,
make sure to listen to this informative episode of When
Science Speaks.